BALDEO SAO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State.

(2.) THE instant Revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 22.6.2004, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC., 7th, Giridih, whereby the conviction of the petitioner for the offences under Sections 325 and 323 of the I.P.C. and the corresponding sentences in respect of the said offences has been confirmed.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the State concedes that from the perusal of the impugned judgment of the lower appellate court, it does appear that the appeal was dismissed for non -prosecution though the learned lower appellate court ilas also made certain observations on the basis of the facts of the case and the evidences on record.