PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL Vs. RAM KRISHAN KHANDELWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN the instant writ application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the defendants -petitioners have challenged the order dated 9.7.2007 passed by Munsit, 1st, Dhanbad in Title Suit No. 113/2006 whereby the application for amendment of the plaint has been allowed.

(2.) THE plaintiffs -respondents filed the aforementioned suit for declaration that the cancellation of agreement of sale dated 16.9.2005 by legal notice dated 28.6.2005 is illegal, void, without jurisdiction and not binding on the plaintiff and further for a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from negotiating sale of flat/office.

(3.) THE defendants contested the suit by filing written statement stating inter alia that the plaintiffs neglected and defaulted in complying the terms and conditions. During the pendency of the suit the plaintiffs filed an application for amendment of cause title of the plaint seeking a relief of specific performance of contract and for addition of a new paragraph about readiness and willingness to purchase the flat. The plaintiffs also sought to change the valuation of suit from Rs. 68,639/ - to Rs. 6,67,000/ -. The defendants opposed the application on the ground that by the proposed amendment the plaintiffs wanted to withdraw their admission made in the plaint. The defendants further opposed on the ground that by the proposed amendment the nature of the suit will be changed inasmuch as the suit was filed for declaration and injunction valuing the suit at Rs. 68,639/ - and by the proposed amendment the plaintiffs wanted to introduce one more relief for specific performance and the suit is to be valued at Rs. 7,35,639/ -. The Court below after hearing the parties allowed the amendment petition by passing the impugned order. 1983 PLJR 58] and Lalji Ranchhoddas vs. Narottam Ranchhoddas [AIR 1953 Nagpur 273].