JAYMANTI DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for an order for quashing the order dated 11.11.2003 (Annexure -2), whereby pursuant to the directions of the Respondent No. 5 issued on 06.11.2003, a fresh selection process for appointment to the post of 'Anganbari Sevika' has been issued, although the petitioner has already been selected for the aforesaid post. The further prayer has been made by the petitioner to issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the Respondents not to give effect to the impugned order (Annexure -2) and to allow the petitioner to work as 'Anganbari Sevika'.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that without cancelling the selection of the petitioner, the Respondents could not have issued the impugned Notification.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel submits that the aforesaid order of this Court passed in the earlier writ application was binding in the case of the petitioner also.