SHAMMA BEGUM Vs. BIHAR COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) IN the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

(3.) IN the year 1999 the interview took place and finally on 28.2.2000 the Commission recommended two candidates each against the second and third post and the same was communicated through memo No. 1636 dated 28.2.2000. As per the recommendation it will be evident that on the second post private respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have been recommended at serial Nos. 1 and 2 whereas the petitioner has been recommended against the third post at serial No. 2.