SUNIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. for the State.

(2.) IN this application the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.11 .2002, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in G.R. Case No. 356/2002, taking cognizance of the offence under Section 395 IPC so far as against the petitioner is concerned.

(3.) THE police in course of investigation did not find any evidence of the connivance of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence and, ultimately, submitted final report so far as against the petitioner is concerned but submitted the charge -sheet against six accused persons.