RANA SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) BEFORE coming to the merit of the present appeal, the admitted facts on record are relevant for proper appreciation of the merit of the appeal.

(3.) IT has come in the impugned order that the Hazri of said Renu Kumari was filed on 12.5.2003 and on 19.5.2005 she was cross -examined by the defence. However no petition was filed when she was examined that she was not Renu Kumari rather Rekha Kumari @ Surekha Kumari said to be sister of the deceased. The prosecution has asserted that she was produced by the police and examined by the concerned APP as Renu Kumari as per identity and there is nothing to show that she was not Renu Kumari. Learned trial Court has further mentioned that when this witness was produced on 12.5.2003, the petition filed on behalf of other accused persons namely Sanjeev Kumar @ Guddu and Bablu Kumar Chaurasia @ Dilip Kumar Chaurasia did not mention that Renu Kumari has been impersonated by Rekha Kumari @ Surekha Kumari.