ANIL KUMAR SINGH Vs. SHOBHA PRASAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 is directed against the order dated 24.11.2005 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro in W.C. Case No.02 of 2004 whereby he has dismissed the application filed by the appellant for compensation mainly on the ground that there exist no relationship of employer and employee.

(2.) THE facts of the case lie in a narrow compass:

(3.) MR . Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on the other hand, submitted that admittedly the appellant was in the employment of M/s. Chhinnamastika Steel Industries, Bokaro Industrial Area, Bokaro and being an employee, he was a member of ESI and was covered under the provisions of E.S.I. Act. Learned counsel submitted that the appellant received compensation under the said Act for the injury sustained.