WAHID KHAN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Jitendra Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the respondent no. 2. JC to GP II appears on behalf of the State.

(2.) ACCORDING to learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned courts below have committed a mistake by not accepting the plea of the petitioner that respondent no.2 Sabratini Devi has herself divorced the petitioner before filing of the recent Maintenance case. According to Sri Nath, the lady herself has left the house and lodged false case against him. Therefore, the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa dated 30.6.2003 and the revisional court dated 10.12.2004 may be quashed.

(3.) I have gone through the materials on record as well as the impugned orders.