LAWS(JHAR)-2008-3-70

HIMANSHU SEKHAR Vs. KUMAR MAHESH CHANDRA

Decided On March 14, 2008
Himanshu Sekhar Appellant
V/S
Kumar Mahesh Chandra Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 11 .1.2008 passed by Sub -Judge -II, Ranchi in Title Suit No.191 of 2004 by which plaintiff's petition for amendment of plaint, filed under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been allowed.

(2.) PLAINTIFF /respondent no. 1 filed Title Suit No. 191/04 in the Court of Sub -Judge -II, Ranchi for a decree for specific performance of the agreement dated 22.8.1998 and for a direction to the defendant no". 1 to execute the deed of sale in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property and further for a declaration that the deed of sale dated 13.3.2004 executed in favour of defendant no. 2 is illegal and not binding on the plaintiff.

(3.) PLAINTIFF filed a petition on 1.12.2007 under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint by introducing some more facts i.e. defendant no. 1 further received a sum of Rs. 30,000/ - in April, 1999 and Rs. 29,000/ - in December, 2001 and gave assurance to execute the sale deed. Defendant no. 2 seriously objected the said prayer by filing rejoinder to the same amendment petition. The court below after hearing the parties allowed the amendment petition.