KRISHNA NATH ORAON Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties finally.

(2.) PETITIONERS had challenged the order dated 18.1.2000 passed in S.A.R. Case No. 134 of 1993 by Special Officer, Scheduled Area Regulation (S.A.R.), Ranchi (respondent No. 4) under Section 71 -A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy (C.N.T.) Act in, favour of respondents 5 to 10, and the order dated 18.1.2000 passed in S.A.R. Appeal No. 30R -15/2000 -01 dated 16.5.2006 and also the order dated 22.5.2006 passed in S.A.R. Revision No. 52 of 2007 affirming the original order.

(3.) ACCORDINGLY , the order for restoration was passed. The petitioners preferred the said appeal and after considering all the points raised by the parties, the appellate authority confirmed the findings of the original authority by passing speaking and reasoned order. Petitioners filed the said revision. It appears from the order of revision that the case of the parties was considered by the revisional authority and the revision was dismissed by affirming the earlier order by indicating the reasons. There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the revenue authority that petitioners could not prove that they are in possession since 1936 and therefore, the judgment reported in : AIR2008SC1139 . Fulchand Munda v. State of Bihar and Ors. is of no help to the petitioners.