(1.) HEARD , Mr. G.C. Jha learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Learned counsel fairly submitted that the appeal may be heard and disposed of on merit.
(2.) AFTER hearing the counsel for the appellant in the limitation matter, we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay. Hence, the limitation petition is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
(3.) THE impugned order, therefore, needs no interference. This appeal is dismissed. Needless to say that the appellant may raise all the points in the main application under Section .166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.