PRADEEP SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All the five anticipatory bail applications arise out of different F.I.Rs, but in all the anticipatory bail applications similar question of law is involved; whether when during course of investigation the petitioners were released on police bail or bail was granted by the court below and subsequently after completion of investigation, police has submitted final form and cognizance has been taken by the court below in nonbailable sections differing with the opinion of the police, in this circumstances, whether anticipatory bail application is maintainable, in view of the fact that the bail bonds submitted by the petitioners were not cancelled and summons/bailable warrant of arrest and nonbailable warrant of arrest was issued; all the anticipatory bail applications were heard together. Before answering the aforesaid questions the brief facts of the case are as under :

(2.) The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 135 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 7143 of 2015 for the offence registered under sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

(3.) Record reveals that;