LAWS(JHAR)-2017-8-13

DHIRAJ MAHTO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On August 19, 2017
Dhiraj Mahto Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These 7 (seven) criminal appeals, filed by 11 convicts have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as the same arise out of the same Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence.

(2.) The appellants herein have been found guilty for offences under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code by Judgment of conviction dated 19.01.2005 passed in Sessions Case No.39 of 2003 / 64 of 2000 by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Godda. After finding these appellants guilty under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code, by an order dated 19.01.2005, all these appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for offence under Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code and imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.5000/- for the offence under Sections 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine amount, they are also to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.

(3.) The prosecution case is based upon the fardbeyan of Dilip Kumar Mahto (P.W.10), which was recorded at 11.50 Hrs. on 05.09.1999. The prosecution case in brief is that on 05.09.1999, at about 06.00 a.m. Dhiraj Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 285 of 2005] came to the house of the informant and requested his father Sheo Pujan Mahto (deceased) to accompany him to Thakurgangti Police Station for some urgent work. Sheo Pujan Mahto accompanied said Dhiraj Mahto on a cycle at about 07.00 a.m. When Sheo Pujan Mahto did not return, the informant got anxious and informed his uncle Nagendra Prasad Mahto and his cousin grandfather Kashinath Mahto. These three persons then went out in search of Sheo Pujan Mahto on foot. When they reached near the tank of Bihari Village at about 10.45 a.m., they saw, the informant's father coming alone riding his cycle. When Sheo Pujan Mahto reached near the Mango trees of Bihari Maidan, the accused Sadanand Thakur son of Shibu Thakur [appellant in Cr. Appeal No. 891 of 2006] Gopal Mahto son of Vijay Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005), Jitu Mahto son of Bhagwan Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 264 of 2005], Permanand Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 278 of 2005), Shyam Lal Mahto son of Panchdeo Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 278 of 2005], Dev Narayan Mahto son of late Samroo Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005], Budhinath Mahto (Sarpanch) [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005), Yogesh Mahto son of Narayan Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005], Beloon Mahto son of Dayal Mahto and Koila Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005] and 6-7 unknown persons suddenly came out and surrounded his father. All these persons were armed with deadly weapons like Pharsa, Garasa, Chheoni etc. Koila Mahto and Dev Narayan Mahto caught hold of the cycle of the deceased, then Shyam Lal Mahto and Jeetu Mahto assaulted him on the back of his head by Chheoni and Garasa as a result of which, Shiv Pujan Mahto fell down from his cycle. No sooner he fell from his cycle, Parmanand Mahto, Sadanand Thakur, Budhinath Mahto, Yogesh Mahto, Beloon Mahto and Gopal Mahto pinned him down on the road along with the cycle and Parmanand Mahto, who was armed with a chheoni, severed the neck of Shiv Pujan Mahto and separated the head from the body. On seeing this, the informant and the two persons accompanying him screamed and shouted for help, but no one came to help them. On seeing the informant, 4-5 aggressors chased the informant, as a result of which the informant ran towards Bihari Village and thereafter, these appellants and others went towards the eastern side of the field shouting "Shanti Pal Jindabad" slogans and throwing pamphlets. Thereafter, this informant, his uncle and cousin grandfather went near the deceased and saw the deceased lying on the road in a pool of blood. The right leg of the deceased was under the bicycle and left leg was over the bicycle and his head was lying at a distance of few feet. Some portion of the chheoni (weapon) was also lying on the ground. Several pamphlets were scattered at the place of occurrence. The informant further narrated that his uncle Nagendra Prasad Mahto and his son Krityanand Mahto had filed a criminal case against some of the accused persons previously and they were convicted in that case and when they came out from custody, after grant of bail, they committed this heinous crime. He further stated that his family was always against naxalites, therefore, the naxalites were also making conspiracy to kill them.