EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHAGABAND COLLIERY Vs. PRESIDENT, BIHAR SHRAMIK SANGH, DHANBAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

(2.) Despite twice service of notice, even after admission of the appeal, respondent has not entered appearance. The appellant is the Management of Bhagaband Colliery, who is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 18th Feb., 2009 passed in W.P.(L) No. 4961 of 2002 whereby the learned Single Judge has refused to interfere in the award dated 28th June, 2001 passed by learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal(No. 2) at Dhanbad in Reference No. 19 of 1993 and been pleased to further modify the award by directing the Management to implement it and pay arrears of salary w.e.f. 28th June, 2001 till June, 2005 for a period of four years as the respondent beneficiary of the award Smt. Mundri Devi would have retired in 2005.

(3.) Smt. Mundri Devi claiming herself to be the wife of late Rameshwar Hazam i.e. the employee, who died on 25th Jan., 1991 in harness had sought compassionate appointment in terms of Clause 9.4.3 of NCWA-IV. The management contested the case and categorically stated that one Bideshi Hazam claiming himself to be the son of the deceased-employee had stated on affidavit that his mother had died before the death of his father and he was the dependent of the late employee. The lady Mundri Devi also had filed an application claiming herself to be the wife of the deceased employee and prayed for compassionate appointment. She also had sworn an affidavit in her support. A dispute arose between Bideshi Hazam and Mundri Devi relating to the relationship between the late employee and the concerned lady. Mundri Devi in her affidavit admitted that Bideshi Hazam was the son of late Rameshwar Hazam but Bideshi Hazam had disputed the status of Mundri Devi as the wife of the deceased-employee. According to his affidavit, the employee had not married twice after the death of his first wife. In his affidavit, he has also disclosed the name of other family members of Rameshwar Hazam. Learned Tribunal considered the plea of the parties and found that the description of family members in the affidavit had similarity with the description of family members given by Bideshi Hazam in his affidavit. Considering the document marked as Ext. M-3 and W-3, it went on to hold that Mundri Devi was the wife of Rameshwar Hazam. Accordingly, being the dependent of her husband she was legally entitled to submit application for her employment under clause 9.4.2 of the NCWA-IV. Under provisions of NCWA-IV Clause 9.4.2, employment of a dependent would be considered if he is physically fit and suitable for appointment and not more than 35 years provided that the age limit shall not apply in the case of spouse. The learned Tribunal found from the evidence of Mundri Devi that she was 50 years old as on the date of her statement recorded i.e. 21st Nov., 1995. Learned Tribunal answered the reference in the following terms :-