ALAKH NIRANJAN Vs. DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has prayed for quashing the adverse entries communicated to him vide Letter No. 420 dated 23.2.1993 (Annexure 5) and Letter No. 1639 dated 30.8.1993 (Annexure 6) with regard to 1991 -92 and 1992 -93 respectively. Both the entries are similar. They are as follows:

(2.) MR . Saurav Arun, appearing for the petitioner submitted that the General Manager had no authority to record the said adverse entries. He further submitted that no enquiry or proceeding has ever been initiated against the petitioner with regard to the allegation made in the said adverse remarks as stated in paragraph 13 of the writ petition which has been replied in paragraph 33 of the counter affidavit by simply saying that the statements made therein are matters of record.

(3.) IN the impugned adverse remarks, it was, inter alia, said that the case is being investigated. On 13.9.2006, this Court directed the respondents to produce the original A.C.R. of the petitioner and the present position of investigation, if any.