HARHAR NARAYAN DEO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties finally.

(2.) PETITIONERS ' grievance is that they have been illegally terminated by the District Superintendent of Education, Giridih under Memo No. 157 dated 27.1.2004.

(3.) FROM the facts and circumstances noticed above, I am satisfied that before issuing the impugned order, the District Superintendent of Education should have made thorough verification. Moreover, the order is not a speaking order.