(1.) HEARD the parties.
(2.) PETITIONERS have challenged the office order dated 8.9.2005 (Annexure -8), by which respondent Nos. 5 to 8 were appointed to officiate as Assistant Headmaster on account of their promotion; on the ground that the rightful claim of the petitioners for such promotion has been ignored, and for consequential reliefs.
(3.) PETITIONERS and respondent Nos. 5 to 8 applied. Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 were selected for promotion by the departmental promotion committee ( D.P.C.).