VINOD KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

(2.) THIS application has been filed under Section 482, Cr PC for quashing the order dated 19.5.2006 passed to Complaint Case No. 113 of 2006 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 120 -B of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner and other accused persons.

(3.) FURTHER case is that after some days, the said cheque was again presented by the accused No. 1, Samir Shah, the Managing Director, Themis Pharmaceuticals but again it got dishonored when it was presented before the Canara Bank, Thereafter, it is the case of the complainant that after expiry of six months of the issuance of the cheque, it was cleared by the petitioner's bank causing loss to the complainant and that too by making some forgery with respect to date of the cheque and thereby, a complaint case was lodged and after inquire was made under Section 202, the Court did not find prima facie case against the petitioner and other accused persons and hence, took cognizance under Sections 420, 468 and 120 -B of the Indian Penal Code.