(1.) Heard Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
(2.) This matter came before this Bench on 21/1/2026, when learned counsel for the petitioner applied for an adjournment. Although we were reluctant to grant an adjournment, we did so with a view to affording the petitioner an additional opportunity and adjourned the matter to the 11th of February 2026 at 2:15 PM for final disposal, subject to any overnight part-heard matters. Our reluctance to adjourn was because the matter is more than 20 years old, and we had clarified that priority would be accorded to such long-pending matters.
(3.) On the 11th of February 2026, the matter was argued, but the arguments could not be concluded. Therefore, the matter was posted on 18/2/2026 at 2:15 PM under the caption "part heard." On this date, the matter was again taken up. The arguments concluded on this date, and the judgment was reserved.