(1.) This First Appeal has been preferred by the original applicant who preferred Matrimonial Suit No. 8 of 2006 against the respondent for declaration that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent is null and void as per Sec. 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This application preferred before the District Judge, Seraikella -Kharsawan has been dismissed and, therefore, the original applicant has preferred this First Appeal. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the marriage between this appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 6th February, 2006. On 14th/17th April, 2006, parents of the respondent came at the residence of this appellant and the respondent had gone along with them to her parental house, where abortion has taken place. Thus, it is alleged by the appellant that she was pregnant within two months which is a major reason for declaration of the marriage null and void under Sec. 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
(2.) We have perused the evidences on record and also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to entertain this First Appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: - -