NANDKESHWAR RAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN both the writ petitions as common questions of law are involved and many of the facts are common, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

(2.) ALL the petitioners have challenged the impugned Letter No. 1265 dated 30th April, 2004, their respective show cause notices, all dated 5th May, 2004 and the orders, contained in Letter Nos. 09, 10 and 12, all dated 26th May, 2004.

(3.) SMT . Mina Devi Compassions - Memo No. Peo n te appointment 28 dated 6.1.1999 5. Smt. Kunti Compassions - Memo No. Peo n Devi te appointment 28 dated 16/1.1999 Name of the petitioner W.P. (S) No. 3170/04 Harihar 29.7.1985 Memo No. Peon Pandey 1821 dated 11.10.1985 4. The petitioners have enclosed a copy of the proceedings of the Establishment Committee to suggest that all of them including husbands of petitioners No. 4 and 5 were appointed prior to 1st August, 1985 on daily wages and subsequently their cases were considered for regular appointment to different posts, as mentioned against their names and on the basis of the recommendation of the Establishment Committee, they were appointed.