USHMAN ANSARI Vs. S.A.I.L.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL these Contempt Applications arise out of a common order dated 7th April, 1998 passed by a Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 161 of 1996(R) and L.P.A. No. 162 of 1996(R), wherein certain directions were given to Opposite party No. 2 for providing appointment to land losers.

(2.) WHILE in some of the cases it is stated that the aforesaid judgment dated 7th April, 1998 has not been complied in letter and spirit, in rest of the cases, it is stated that the subsequent order passed in other Contempt proceeding arising out of the same judgment has not yet been complied.

(3.) IT appears that a number of contempt petitions were filed by one or other parties, alleging non compliance of the Court's orders, on the ground that they have not been appointed inspite of the order of the Court. It was pleaded that their names were appearing in the panel but they had not been appointed. One order was passed by the Court on 1St August, 2000 in MJC No. 139 of 1999(R) [Lal Bahadur Dubey v. B.N. Singh and Ors]. In the said case, taking into consideration the earlier order passed by the Court and the proposed scheme, the contempt application was disposed of with certain observations.