LAWS(JHAR)-2006-4-12

DILESHWAR MATHO Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Decided On April 25, 2006
DILESHWAR MATHO Appellant
V/S
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All the appellants stand convicted for the offence under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve imprisonment for seven years and one year respectively by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, Khunti (Ranchi) in Sessions Trial No. 180 of 1997. Since both the appeals arise out of the same judgment, they are taken up together for disposal on merit.

(2.) Briefs facts leading to their conviction are that the informant Shatrughan Mahto in the night of 20-9-1996 stated before Bundu Police along with the dead body of his sister's daughter that deceased Sharthi Devi was married with appellant Bhuneshwar Mahto in the month of Baisakh of 1992 according to Hindu custom after giving dowry as per their capacity. However, after sometimes the appellant started asking for colour television, Godrej Almirah and further cash from said Sharthi Devi. According to the informant, these facts were reported to the parents of the deceased. It is further stated that in the evening of 20-9-1996, appellant Bhuneshwar Mahto came to the house of the informant in a Maruti Van and asked where about of his wife Sharthi Devi. Getting suspicious on the moves of appellant Bhuneshwar Mahto, the informant along with others proceeded in search of Sharthi Devi and during that course, her body was recovered from the well of the appellant. Further case of the prosecution is that the deceased was found having her neck tied with sari and one heavy stone, used as roller in flour making (Attachakki). The dead body was brought out in presence of the informant with the help of the villagers and the matter was reported to the police. According to the informant, Sharthi Devi was killed by the appellants just because he could not satisfy the demand of dowry and thrown in the well.

(3.) The police after recording the statement, prepared the inquest report and lodged Bundu P.S. Case No. 125 of 1996 under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal code. The dead body was sent for post mortem examination and investigation was taken up. After completion of the investigation, the police finally submitted charge-sheet against all the appellants to face trial. Their case was committed to the Court of Sessions for their trial. The learned trial Court framed charges against all the appellants under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code on 6-8-1999. The trial Court after examining the witnesses and considering the defence, found and held all the appellants guilty for the offences under Sections 304B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to serve imprisonment for seven years and one year respectively.