DAROGA YADAV Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner was in the services of the Border Security Force (hereinafter referred to as the B.S.F.). In the extremist attack in Jammu and Kashmir State, he sustained bullet injuries resulting into complete blindness. He was declared 100% disabled. By the impugned order No. A 228/Estt -1/2004/33930 -39 dated 31st December, 2004, he has been made to retire from service on the ground of physical disability, declaring him unfit for the services w.e.f. 31st December, 2004 under the cloak of Rule 25 of the B.S.F. Rules, 1969, whereas the petitioner claimed protection under the provision of 'The Persons with Disabilities (equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the Disabilities Act, 1995).

(2.) IN the present case, the questions arise for determination are:

(3.) IN the impugned order dated 31st December, 2004, it has been mentioned that a Medical Board held on 27th September, 2604 which placed him in the medical category SiHtAiPiEs with 100% disabled and the said Board also considered him unfit for further service. But by the letter written by the petitioner dated 13th December, 2004 addressed to the Inspector General, B.S.F., C.G.O. Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi (Annexure -3), he has denied such fact and specifically stated that he has not been examined by any Medical Board nor he was given any information regarding any such report of a Medical Board. By the said letter, he also requested to supply a copy of the notice by which he was informed to appear before the Medical Board. It was alleged that on the basis of a forged report of so called Medical Board, steps were taken to retire him.