RAJ KUMAR NEERAJ Vs. RANCHI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application has been preferred by the petitioner against the order, contained in Memo No. 2780 dated 19th September, 2000, whereby and whereunder, it has been ordered to recover 40. salary from the petitioner, on the ground that he was unauthorizedly absent during the said period. Further prayer has been made to set aside the order, contained in Memo No. 3014, dated 21st October, 2000, whereby and whereunder, salary of the petitioner for a period of 149 days has been deducted on account of unauthorized absence from service.

(2.) AS the case can be disposed of on short points, it is not necessary to discuss ill the facts, except the relevant one.

(3.) SO far as unauthorized absence for a period of 40 days is concerned, the petitioner has pointed out that he sustained leg injury and, therefore, could not attend the duty. With regard to unauthorized absence for 149 days, relating to different period, the petitioner has disputed certain dates.