LAWS(JHAR)-2006-4-152

HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD., THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY Vs. L.D.N. VERMA, EX ASSISTANT MANAGER (MAR) HMBP HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

Decided On April 21, 2006
Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd., Through Its Constituted Attorney Appellant
V/S
L.D.N. Verma, Ex Assistant Manager (Mar) Hmbp Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, for the petitioner and Mr. S. Srivastava, for respondent No. 1.

(2.) IT is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that by the order under review this Court directed the disciplinary authority to exercise jurisdiction under Section 26(3) of the Rule, but the disciplinary authority had already referred the matter to the appointing authority, i.e. the chairman -cum -Managing Director (CMD for short), who was a higher authority, observing that the charges were of serious nature and accordingly the appointing authority (CMD) exercised such jurisdiction of the disciplinary authority and passed orders of dismissal on 4.3.1994. The CMD, who was also the appellate authority, by order dated 26.12.1994, dismissed the appeal filed against the order dated 4.3.1994. In these circumstances, this Court held that the said order dated 26.12.1994 should not have been passed by the same authority, who passed the order on 4.3.1994.

(3.) MR . Srivastava submitted that petitioner has not made out any ground for review. He further submitted that as the order under review was not complied by the disciplinary authority, within fifteen days, an application for contempt was filed by the writ petitioner (O.P. No. 1) and thereafter this review petition has been filed to escape from contempt. He further submitted that O.P. No. 1 has not been paid anything as yet and the Management is lingering the matter.