(1.) HEARD the parties.
(2.) IN this writ petition the petitioner, amongst others, has prayed for quashing the order dated 31.1.2005/27.4.2005 whereby the Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division has dismissed the revision application of the petitioner by a cryptic order.
(3.) LEARNED counsel appearing on behalf of the State, while admitting that the impugned order of the Commissioner is not well reasoned, submitted that the Deputy Commissioner has dealt with the petitioner's grounds in. detail and had recorded reasons for not accepting the same and the learned Commissioner has affirmed the same, without going into detail. Learned counsel submitted that there is no infirmity or illegality in the Commissioner's order.