(1.) Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents.
(2.) By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the Memo No.PO(G)/PD/9.3.0/16/1713 dtd. 11/9/2016 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition), whereby the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment has been rejected by the respondent-Central Coalfields Limited, on two grounds.
(3.) The first ground is that the claim for compassionate appointment of the petitioner was made after 1 1/2 years from the date of death of his father, which is beyond the period which has been prescribed by the respondents in their circulars.