MALABIKA GHOSH AND ORS. Vs. BALWANT KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IT appears from the record that the respondent had taken no objection from the counsel and thereafter has not appeared in this case on several dates. Consequently, this appeal/cross -objection is being heard ex parte. F.A. No. 67 of 2007 was preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15.2.2007 and 24.2.2007 respectively passed in T.S. No. 69/2003 by the learned Sub -Judge -I, Ranchi whereby the suit of the plaintiff was dismissed with respect to specific performance for execution of sale deed by the defendants. While dismissing the suit of the plaintiff the defendants were directed to return a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/ - which was received by original defendant i.e. the father (since deceased). The present appellants were substituted as legal heirs/representatives of original defendant.

(2.) F .A. No. 67/2007 was dismissed for non prosecution vide order dated 22.12.2014.

(3.) HEARD . Perused the impugned order, Lower court records and the plaint.