RAMU HANSDA AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Learned counsel has submitted that he has removed the defects as pointed out by the office. This revision is directed against the order dated 16.12.2014 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge -II, Godda, in S.T. No. 67 of 2013, arising out of G.R. Case No. 136 of 2012, whereby the petition for discharge under Sec. 227 Cr.P.C. was rejected.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is no ingredient to make out the offence under Sec. 315 of the Indian Penal Code and neither any material evidence has been collected by the police to make out a case under the aforesaid Sec. as there is no medical report to show that the petitioner had caused abortion of the unborn child of the informant.

(3.) Heard. On perusal of the order impugned it is explicit that the court below while rejecting the prayer for discharge under Sec. 227 Cr.P.C. has observed as follows: - -