BIJLI SINGH Vs. SULEKHA SINGH AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by original respondent no. 3 in the W.P.(C) No. 63 of 2006 as the writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 19th February, 2009, which was preferred by present respondent no. 1 (original petitioner) whereby the writ petition was allowed despite the house in question was allotted to this appellant and also despite the fact that without cancelling the allotment letter in favour of this appellant again the same has been reallotted to respondent no. 1 (original petitioner) and that too second allotment by a small employee of the respondent Housing Board, without authority of the Housing Board.

(2.) Factual Matrix:

(3.) Contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant: