TATA STEEL LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL these three petitions involving common questions of law are taken on board together for their consideration.

(2.) WE have already heard Mr. Singhvi, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Jharkhand on the last occasion at length on admission and in the interim relief matter, whereby stay of execution of the impugned demand notices is asked for.

(3.) THE petitioner, Tata Steel Ltd., has prayed for the following reliefs: -