DIPTI MOOKERJEE Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WITH the consent of both the parties this application is being finally disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

(2.) IN the present writ application the petitioners have made two fold prayers. Firstly, to quash Annexure -3 dated 06/11/2004, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, whereby the order was passed to lodged First Information Report against Alok Kumar Choudhary, Om Prakash Chawnika and Kumud Kumar Jha for commission of the alleged offences under Sections 423, 420 and 120 -B of the Indian Penal Code. It was further directed to issue notice to Thakur Prasad Hansda to show cause as to why the departmental proceeding be not initiated against him. Secondly, that the respondents be restrained from interfering with the right, title interest and possession of the petitioners, or the persons claiming through them over the land in question.

(3.) IT is asserted that after the aforesaid judgment of this Court in CWJC No. 2082/1996 (R), the writ petitioners through their power -of -attorney holder executed registered sale deeds on 27.10.2004, 28.10.2004 and 29.10.2004 in favour of M/s. Bool Builders Pvt. Limited. It is further stated that the aforesaid judgment of this Court in aforesaid CWJC No. 2082/ 1996 (R) was never challenged before any Forum and the said judgment became final and binding on all the parties.