SATISH KUMAR SINGH Vs. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has prayed for quashing the order as contained in letter dated 19.11.2004 issued by the General ManagCCL, Ranchi whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment has been refused.

(2.) IT appears that in 1985 the land of the petitioners father was acquired under Land Looser Scheme. The petitioners father applied for appointment in 1994, but because of his over age his appointment was cancelled. In 1995, as advised by the respondents, the petitioner applied for appointment under Land Looser Scheme which has been refused by the impugned order.