GOMA HO Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ application has been preferred by the petitioner against the last part of the order dated 7th December, 1999 passed by the Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi in Singhbhum (East) in SAR Revision No. 8/99, whereby and where under, the Commissioner while accepted that he was confused in the case, observed that the opposite party must file an appeal before the High Court for necessary amendment of order dated 28th January, 1991, passed in CWJC No. 223 of 1984(R).

(2.) AS the case can be disposed of on a short point, it is not necessary to discuss all the facts except the relevant ones.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner, contesting respondent No. 5 and the State, all of them accept that the revisional authority was confused and instead of advising the parties, should have determined the case on merits. He should have either upheld or disagreed with the finding of the Court below.