GAJADHAR RAJAK Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BEFORE proceeding with the matter, the order which was recorded on 11.02.2014 needs to be reproduced which is hereunder:

(2.) IT is the case of the prosecution that this petitioner, a PDS Dealer had received rice in total 126.35 quintal for three months for distributing it among the beneficiaries under the scheme of BPL and Antodaya but number of card holders made complaint that they have not received rice and thus, it has been alleged that this petitioner having lifted 210.60 quintal of rice for distributing it did not distribute it among the beneficiaries and thereby he misappropriated it.

(3.) THE ground upon which the order taking cognizance is being assailed has already been recorded under order dated 11.2.2014 mentioned above.