ANSHUL AGROCHEMICALS Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BEFORE I proceed with the matter, the order passed by this Court on 13/03/2014, needs to be reproduced, which reads as follows: -

(2.) PURSUANT to that direction an order was passed on 24/03/2014, wherein the same thing has been reiterated which was there in the order dated 16/12/2013, in spite of the fact that direction had been given for reconsideration of the matter. Only, one additional ground was recorded to the effect that the Director, Agriculture, had not given his opinion with respect to the matter pertaining to column nos. 7 & 9 and, therefore, it has been recorded that the report of the Director was not worth considerable.

(3.) WITH respect to first objection it be stated that when the samples of Micro -nutrient supplied to the other Districts as stated above, have not been sent for its chemical examination how the report in this regard would be received and, as such, objection taken in this regard appears to be quite irrational beyond comprehension of any person of ordinary prudence, arbitrary and illegal. So far as second objection is concerned, it has been reported by the Director in its report that the quantity of the Micro -nutrient, supplied by the petitioner in the Districts can be verified from the records of the Districts. Admittedly, it has not been verified, still order has been passed that the petitioner has not supplied the quantity to the extent, which the appellant has. There any opinion framed is without any basis.