TIKAIT MISTRY Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State.

(2.) Petitioner in the instant case came out successful for appointment as Constable under advertisement No. 1/2004 and was also called to appear through memo No. 300 dated 5.3.2008 issued by the respondent No. 3, Superintendent of Police, Koderma along with his certificates of educational qualification at Police Line, Koderma. However, the respondents refused to appoint him on the ground that his date of birth mentioned in his certificate appeared to be interpolated as there was overwriting on it. Thereafter petitioner has approached this Court in the year 2009 in the present writ application for commanding upon the respondents to take a decision on his claim and issue appointment letter on the said post.

(3.) During the proceedings of the case on the instant controversy, vide order dated 3.5.2010, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Koderma was directed by this Court, which is as follows:-