ANJU KUMARI Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that by order dated 20th June, 2013 Annexure -4 issued by the District Programme Officer, Lohardaga -respondent -4, the C.D.P.O. (Child Development Programme Officer), Kisko, Lohardaga has been informed that the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga has rejected the proposal for appointment of the petitioner as Aganbari Sewika for the centre Nini. According to the petitioner, in the meeting held on 26th February, 2013 in the Aam Sabha, cases of several candidates were considered for selection to the post of Sewika and the Aam Sabha unanimously recommended the proposal for appointment of the petitioner as she was found to be belonging to the Schedule Tribe category, a daughter -in -law married in the said village and was found physically and mentally in good health and she was found to be having qualification of Intermediate in Arts, Annexure 2 series contain her Graduation certificate. Her name is also shown at serial No. 334 of the voter list under Kisko P.S., District -Lohardaga. The Block Development Officer, Kisko had also issued caste certificate in favour of the petitioner showing her of Lohra caste belonging to village -Nini. The Circle Officer, Lohardaga has also issued a certificate of residence for the purposes of employment vide Annexure -2/3 dated 14th November, 2011 showing the petitioner as resident of village -Nini P.S. -Kisko.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner relied upon a judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4707 of 2007 dated 22nd November, 2012 in support of his contention that violation of the guidelines have been deprecated in the said case by the Hon'ble Court as well.