NAND GOPAL SAH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. R.P. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

(2.) IN this writ petition, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to issue appointment letters for the respective posts for which all the petitioners have been declared successful as per the result published by the respondents.

(3.) PETITIONERS ' case is that before publication of result a meeting was held under the Chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner (Development) Singhbhum West in which five members were present and all the procedures were followed for selecting the candidates including the petitioners. The petitioners were surprised to know that on 25.2.2004, the Deputy Commissioner has published fresh advertisement for the same post for which the petitioners have been selected.