SHIV KUMAR VISHWAKARMA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the order dated 28.2.2001 passed in CWJC No. 829 of 2001 has not yet been complied with Mr. Ananda Sen, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties with reference to paragraph 10 of the counter -affidavit, submits that the order cannot be complied with because the name of the petitioner has not been sponsored by the Employment Exchange and therefore, he has not been called for interview. It appears that pursuant to the order dated 28.2.2001, an order has been passed and it is placed at running page 23 and upon perusal of paragraph 4 thereof, it is evident that only those people were interviewed whose names were recommended by the Employment Exchange.

(2.) MR . Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has stated that the order of this Court which was passed on 28.2.2001 is based on the order dated 1.8.2000 which was passed in MJC No. 139 of 1999 (R). He places reliance on the following paragraphs, which, according to him, was passed on consent of the parties:

(3.) MR . Ananda Sen, learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that the aforementioned order quoted above cannot be read in isolation because it has to be read along with following paragraph: