ANAND MOHAN AGARWAL Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

(2.) THIS writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 14.10.2003 passed by Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi Whereby he has rejected the application filed by the petitioners for review/ recall of the order dated 5.9.2001.

(3.) MR . R.S. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed substitution petition and the amendment petition on 5.9.2001 without giving notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioners have no knowledge about the order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal and no substitution could have been made when the suit and the restoration application stood abated.