ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) FROM the order passed in L.P.A. No. 639 of 2001, which the petitioner has prayed for review, it appears that the appeal was disposed of the modifying the order of the learned Single Judge passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1403 of 2000 (R).

(2.) THE learned Single Judge had disposed of the said writ application with the following order which is quoted herein -below :

(3.) IN L.P.A. No. 639 of 2001 the said order of the learned Single Judge was modified to the extent that the amount calculated by the licensee on the basis of the market rate at a sum of Rs. 24,35,520.00 which was directed to be paid to the writ petitioner with 8% interest was altered by holding that he would be entitled to get the price of seized goods, which were stolen away, on the rate, the goods other than those articles, which were stolen away, were sold in the year 1998 subject to the final decision of the Deputy Commissioner regarding the rate as per the order dated 1.7.1998 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1628 of 1998.