(1.) HEARD the parties. Bulaki Ram Versus Jatru Mahali
(2.) PETITIONER prays for quashing the decision of the Tender Committee dated 31.5.2004 whereby and whereunder respondent No. 7 has been awarded the work.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner relied on a decision of the Apex Court in the case of A.B.L. International Ltd. and another V/s. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. and Others (2004) 3 SCC 553 and submitted that in an appropriate case, writ Court can go into the disputed facts and the evidences if it is satisfied that the impugned action is arbitrary.