ARCHANA GUPTA Vs. SHEO SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 11.8.2004 passed by the learned Additional Munsif, III, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 64/2003, whereby he has accepted the written statement of the respondents awarding cost of Rs. 100/ -.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of the service of summons on the defendants on 22.5.2003 through the process of the Court and on 2.6.2003 by registered post, the defendants for the first time appeared on 11.8.2003 and filed their written statement on the same day which has been erroneously accepted by the Court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has no power to grant such time as the defendants had not appeared earlier and prayed for time.

(3.) THIS application is accordingly, dismissed.