SHYAM KUMAR THAKUR Vs. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties. As both the cases are similar they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

(2.) THE petitioners have challenged the order of termination of their services issued on 24.4.1997, Annexure -4 series.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners submitted that there was no bar in appointing them as assistant teachers on honorarium if they were related to the employees of the Board, that if there was financial crisis and overstaffing, there was no reason to make advertisement for appointment of assistant teachers; that the termination order is bad as the notice pay was not paid equivalent to the regular teachers, that as the respondents did not succeed in the said cases, they acted in biased manner in terminating the services of the petitioners.