MOHAN RAM Vs. BALRAM RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS second appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.7.1996 and decree dated 7.8. i996 passed in Title Appeal No. 15/92, whereby and whereunder the learned First Additional District Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj dismissed the appeal.

(2.) WHILE admitting this appeal, the following substantial question of law was formulated : "Whether the learned 1st appellate Court and the learned trial Court erred in law in not considering the non -mention of time limit in the agreement of reconveyance for the purpose of contract under the specific performance of contract which is a discrepancy one and that the decision arrived at by the learned 1st Appellate Court considering 11 years as the reasonable time limit can be illegally construed -

(3.) THE further case of the plaintiff is that he is always ready to pay the amount of Rs. 9,500/ - as and when Court directs him to pay the amount to the defendant and if defendant agrees to receive the same.