LAWS(JHAR)-2023-2-60

URMILA DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On February 10, 2023
URMILA DEVI Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner is the widow of the deceased- Awadhesh Kumar Sharma, who was a Havaldar in the Police Department, Jharkhand. His permanent place of posting was West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. He was sent for election duty in Palamau in the year 2014. He died during the election period there. The cause of death was not specifically mentioned but the respondents concluded that he may have suffered sun stroke and died or from some illness.

(2.) The son of the deceased was appointed on compassionate ground. This petitioner, who happens to be the widow of the deceased, is praying for ex gratia lump sum compensation, as she claims that she is covered by a Scheme which provides for ex gratia. It is her claim that since the death either by way of sun stroke, can be said to be an accident, so far as the husband of this petitioner is concerned, and as the same had occurred during his duty hours, thus she is entitled for Rs.10,00,000.00 (rupees ten lakh) as ex-gratia payment. Further, it is the case of the petitioner that the Police Department has already recommended the case of the petitioner but the Department of Home, Jharkhand, is yet to take a decision.

(3.) Counsel for the State admits that the case of the petitioner has been positively recommended by the Police Department, but he submits that the cause of death has not yet been asserted and the enquiry report suggest that the same can also be due to sun stroke or from any other ailments. He admits that the deceased was on Election Duty, at the time of death.