LAWS(JHAR)-2013-6-52

RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On June 18, 2013
RAJ KUMAR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying that F.I.R. pertaining to Hathauri P.S. Case No. 27/2007, dated 2.7.2007 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, which is now pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in the district of Samastipur (Bihar) may be quashed.

(3.) Office has raised objection with respect to territorial jurisdiction of this Court because of the reason that F.I.R. was lodged in territorial jurisdiction of State of Bihar i.e., within the territorial jurisdiction of Patna High Court and criminal case in pursuance of F.I.R. as P.S. Case No. 27/2007 is also pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in the district of Samastipur (Bihar) falling within the territorial jurisdiction of State of Bihar.