MEERA DEVI Vs. BIRENDRA PRASAD BHAGAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WHEN interlocutory application being I.A. No. 2986 of 2012 is taken up, request has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties to take up the main petition for final disposal. Petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/ direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 10.9.2009, passed by the learned Sub -Judge -II, Daltonganj, Palamau, in Title Suit No. 28/97, whereby the learned court -below did not record the compromise entered into by the plaintiffs and the defendant No.9/ respondent No.11 herein and has rejected the petition dated 21.8.2009, filed by the plaintiffs/ petitioners for recording statement of the parties to the compromise entered on 20.7.2009.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondents and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has referred to and relied upon the following judgments: (i) AIR 1955 Patna 243; (ii) AIR 1969 Guj. 76; (iii) AIR 2000 SC 2757.